Private Law
Sajad Elmi; Ali Gharibe; Ismaeil Saghiri
Abstract
In the last part of Article 244 of the Civil Code, the legislator stipulates: "... the condition of corollary cannot be revocable" therefore, in order to explain the aforementioned ruling the majority of law scholars have stated that in cases where the condition of corollary is formed by the ...
Read More
In the last part of Article 244 of the Civil Code, the legislator stipulates: "... the condition of corollary cannot be revocable" therefore, in order to explain the aforementioned ruling the majority of law scholars have stated that in cases where the condition of corollary is formed by the creation itself, in terms of the fulfillment of the condition, the possibility of its revocation is unthinkable, and in the event that the fulfillment of the mentioned condition is impossible for some reason, basically no condition has been formed to talk about its revocation, however, this research has not been accepted by jurists. Jurisprudential studies also indicate that according to great jurists, it is not possible to revoke the condition of corollary. Therefore, this research with a descriptive-analytical method, while examining the theories of law scholars and great jurists, including arguing the legal mechanisms of suspension and timing, viewing the registration of the said condition, considers the last part of Article 244 of the aforementioned law indicating the irrevocability of the condition of corollary in most cases and by presenting new analyses infers the possibility of revocability of the said condition in a series of cases.
Farideh Shokri
Abstract
The viewpoint of the most Imamieh jurists is that the Collateral must be a on real object and be handed to the mortgagee and the debt must be a fixed debt. Accordingly, they rescinded the mortgage of the debt & interest. This is the same standpoint prescribed by legislator in Iranian civil code. ...
Read More
The viewpoint of the most Imamieh jurists is that the Collateral must be a on real object and be handed to the mortgagee and the debt must be a fixed debt. Accordingly, they rescinded the mortgage of the debt & interest. This is the same standpoint prescribed by legislator in Iranian civil code. In the recent years, the credit transactions were increased, remarkably and the borrowing process for commercial activists were facilitated and following them, in some Act and regulations governing on bank affairs, contrary to civil Act order, the mortgage of cases not to be a real object like debt mortgage has been recognized. Irrespective of difference in standpoints among law authors in explanation and/or illustration of mortgage order, it seems that in view of the requirements of civil Act, the priority of mortgagee effects on such contracts such as debt mortgage can be recognized till it is not inconsistent with the rights of other creditors, otherwise in case of inconsistency, the priority of mortgagee in such mortgage in respect of other creditors is considered as cancelled.