Public Law
mohammad ghsem tangestani; Abbas tavazoni zadeh; Mohammad Hossein Sadeghi
Abstract
Given the expansion of the role of the state in society and the consequent increase in relations and disputes between the governed and the government, leaving the resolution of all these disputes to the judiciary is neither possible nor desirable. Accordingly, the design of internal organizational mechanisms ...
Read More
Given the expansion of the role of the state in society and the consequent increase in relations and disputes between the governed and the government, leaving the resolution of all these disputes to the judiciary is neither possible nor desirable. Accordingly, the design of internal organizational mechanisms to expedite the resolution of administrative disputes under the title of "Administrative pre-trial" as one of the alternative methods of resolving these disputes, has been considered by policy makers of various legal systems; However, the idea is still controversial in some countries. Given the practical experiences of the French and British legal systems, the present article seeks to answer the question by a descriptive-analytical method to what extent the prediction of the preschool institution is compatible with the requirements of the Iranian administrative law system? Separating the Administrative pre-trial body from the quasi-judicial and judicial oversight bodies, it seems that the interpretation of the will of the founding power on the one hand and the provisions of important laws such as the law of permanent provisions of the country's development plans and the law of the Sixth Development Plan and Existence The existing Administrative pre-litigation mechanisms in some executive bodies all confirm that not only is pre-litigation legally possible, but also its recognition in order to reduce the volume of cases before the Administrative Court of Justice, at least in the case of some important and recurring cases. its necessary.
Public Law
Ebrahim mousazadeh; Ali Reza Nasrollahi; Mostafa Mansourian
Abstract
Judicial review, due to its unique features, including the guarantee of coercive executions, has a decisive role in realizing the rule of law and guaranteeing the rights of citizens. The legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran clearly recognized the category of public rights and interest in the ...
Read More
Judicial review, due to its unique features, including the guarantee of coercive executions, has a decisive role in realizing the rule of law and guaranteeing the rights of citizens. The legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran clearly recognized the category of public rights and interest in the field of administrative proceedings by approving the amendment of the Administrative Court Law (2023). This is the case that with the passage of more than a century of public rights and interests, these rights are still facing challenges in their birthplace, which is the criminal law. The Constitution, as a document containing the highest legal norms, requires public institutions to follow it. The Constitution of 1358 by establishing the "restore" of public rights and interests anf specifying the "duty" of the "judiciary" has drawn up the framework of proceedings in this field. In this way the question that arises in the meantime is "How is the order of the constitutional legislator to restore public rights and interest matters in the administrative proceedings?" The writing with the analytical method and using library sources especially the review of the opinions of the basic founders comes to the conclusion that the restoration of public rights as the duty of the administrative court is accompanied by foundations, criteria and requirements which are centered on interpretation methods. Verbal and practical oriented is not realized.
Public Law
Ayat mulaee; fatemeh mirahmadi
Abstract
Supporting production and business requires identifying challenges and barriers in various areas. One of the most important of these areas is obtaining contract insurance, especially contracting contracts in the current practice of the Social Security Organization and the claims' assessment boards of ...
Read More
Supporting production and business requires identifying challenges and barriers in various areas. One of the most important of these areas is obtaining contract insurance, especially contracting contracts in the current practice of the Social Security Organization and the claims' assessment boards of this organization there is no precise and logical criterion for calculating the contract premiums. This situation has become one of the most contentious issues in the branches of the Administrative Court of Justice and the votes of many claims assessment boards are violated for various formal and substantive reasons, which require serious attention. So, this question has been answered: What are the most important challenges and causes of violation of claims in the branches of the Court of Administrative Justice? In answer to this question, using the research method: descriptive-analytical, the most important results are as follows: First, there are various challenges, such as how to calculate and obtain premiums, the composition of claims assessment boards, and the determination of premiums based on audits of financial offices. Secondly, these challenges indicate a lack of indicators, principles and conditions governing the receipt of premiums in the relevant legal documents that need to be corrected.
Public Law
vali rostami; Seyyed Mohammad Mehdi Ghamami; Amirhossein Aslezaeim
Abstract
The nature of local council taxes is not explained in any of the relevant laws and regulations, despite the precedent of Approval, the amounts paid to the government and its direct connection with public rights. As a result, various inferences have been made from this concept, and many tensions have ...
Read More
The nature of local council taxes is not explained in any of the relevant laws and regulations, despite the precedent of Approval, the amounts paid to the government and its direct connection with public rights. As a result, various inferences have been made from this concept, and many tensions have been created between legislators and taxpayers, and a major capacity and power of regulatory bodies have been engaged in this issue. Also, the requirements explained in the lawsuits of the Judicial Oversight Body of the Administrative Court of Justice have not been sufficiently deterrent in reforming this process. Therefore, in line with the answer to the question of what is the concept and the nature of taxes approved by local councils in Iran's legal system, with a descriptive-analytical method and by analyzing similar concepts and trends in legal documents and decisions of the Administrative Court, the nature of local taxes as a concept corresponding to the presentation Direct service to the same source of collection of taxes at the same time or in the context of time before receiving and after receiving taxes, and we found that the element of service is an inherent basis of this nature that the approval of taxes, its sources and place of expenditure is linked to it and in case of non-compliance with the elements of the definition, basically, the imposition of taxes is distorted.
Public Law
Mina Akbari; fatemeh Afshari
Abstract
Legislative authorities have determined a referee called the Disciplinary Council of Construction Engineering Organization to investigate the guild violations committed by construction engineers. From the point of view of the principles of public law, the constitution as well as the views of the Guardians ...
Read More
Legislative authorities have determined a referee called the Disciplinary Council of Construction Engineering Organization to investigate the guild violations committed by construction engineers. From the point of view of the principles of public law, the constitution as well as the views of the Guardians Council, judicial review on this council is necessary. However, the legislator has not specified any competent court as the reference of judicial review on the Disciplinary Council of Construction Engineering Organization. In the judiciary as well, pointing to the non-governmental nature of the Construction Engineering Organization, the Public Board of the Administrative Justice Court has not approved the competency of this court to investigate the decisions made by the Disciplinary Council of that Organization. In addition to, the Public Board of the Supreme Court did not consider the decisions of the Disciplinary Council of the Engineering System Organization to be subject to appeal in courts, citing the word "certainty" authorized in Article 24 of the Engineering System Law. Now the question is what is the legal solution to solve this legal and judicial challenge? Regarding the resulted condition, it is suggested for the Public Board of the Supreme Court to modify its already adopted approach to “the certainty of the decisions of this administrative tribunals” in the new decisions about the united practice; because this approach contradicts the religious, constitutional law, and the staute. Certainty of these rules refers to the certainty of administrative and executive procedure and cannot be generalized to judicial certainty. In the second step, as a long-term plan, the Administrative Justice Court should be recognized as a competent reference to investigate the complaints about the decisions of all the administrative tribunals. This procedure is more adapted to the concept of administrative proceeding. Therefore, with modification of the rules,
Private Law
Koorosh Ostovar Sangari
Abstract
AbstractOne of the issues raised after the establishment of the Administrative Court of Justice was who can appear as a plaintiff in the Administrative Court of Justice and whether state agencies can appear as a plaintiff in the Administrative Court of Justice. According to the rulings No. 37, 38 and ...
Read More
AbstractOne of the issues raised after the establishment of the Administrative Court of Justice was who can appear as a plaintiff in the Administrative Court of Justice and whether state agencies can appear as a plaintiff in the Administrative Court of Justice. According to the rulings No. 37, 38 and 39 of the Court of Administrative Justice in 1368, state agencies can in no way be present in the branches of the Court of Administrative Justice as a plaintiff. This decision was approved by the General Assembly of the Supreme Court in No. 602 in 1374, but the question was raised that what is the task of the state apparatus in relation to matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of Administrative Justice? In 2007, the General Assembly of the Supreme Court, Decision No. 699, tried to somehow open this deadlock and find a solution to this problem. However, these votes of the General Assembly of the Supreme Court created other problems, hence the vote of unity. Procedure No. 792 was issued in July 2016 and has somehow annulled votes No. 602 and 699. The author believes that vote 972 is a positive development in the separation of powers of the Court of Administrative Justice and public courts.Keywords: Procedural Unity Vote, Jurisdiction, Administrative Court of Justice, Public Court,State.
Public Law
zahra Bidar; ebrahim abdipour
Abstract
The general principles and rules of public economic law indicate how the government intervenes in the economy and its evolution towards redefining the regulatory role of the government. Studying the indicators of judicial supervision in the field of economic regulation of the government requires reviewing ...
Read More
The general principles and rules of public economic law indicate how the government intervenes in the economy and its evolution towards redefining the regulatory role of the government. Studying the indicators of judicial supervision in the field of economic regulation of the government requires reviewing the procedure of the General Assembly of the Court of Administrative Justice and extracting the mentioned principles. The purpose of this descriptive-analytical study is to reach the conclusion that the principles accepted by the Court of Administrative Justice in this area and how they are crystallized in the practice of this institution. The findings of this study show that the principle of protection of private property, the principle of freedom of trade and industry, the principle of equality, the principle of competition and the principle of proportionality are among the principles that are explicitly and implicitly documented based on their legal principles in Iranian law. The annulment of government regulations by the General Assembly of the Court of Administrative Justice falls within the scope of public economic law.
Public Law
mohamad reza rafeei
Abstract
The "uniformity of the judicial precedent", according to the provisions of Article 161 of the Constitution, is one of the aims of our judicial system. There are various ways to create uniformity of the judicial precedent, including issuance of Decision as a Unified Judicial Precedent. Both the Supreme ...
Read More
The "uniformity of the judicial precedent", according to the provisions of Article 161 of the Constitution, is one of the aims of our judicial system. There are various ways to create uniformity of the judicial precedent, including issuance of Decision as a Unified Judicial Precedent. Both the Supreme Court and the Administrative Justice Court have the legal authority to issue of Decision as a Unified Judicial Precedent, and so far, many of the two chambers have issued Decisions. However, the Decisions as a Unified Judicial Precedent faces many challenges that, given the important position of these Decisions in our legal-judicial system, it is necessary to address these challenges. The first step in achieving this goal is to identify the challenges that are the subject of this paper. The main question of this article is: What are the challenges facing the Decisions as a Unified Judicial Precedent? The results of this descriptive and analytical study show that some of the challenges of this institution are structured in nature, which can be inconsistent with the constitution, the lack of religious and constitutional supervision, the multiplicity of issuers and overlapping subordinates, inaccurate basics of Decisions, Lack of coverage of out-of-Decision conflicts. The unclear timing of entry into force and the extent of their impact on the past can be mentioned. Others are rooted in the functioning of the issuing authority, which points to Non-Sufficiency, Not timely, non-compliance with Choosing more important things, and lack of Strength.
Public Law
ali mohammad fallahzadeh; mohammad najafi kalyani
Abstract
Most of judgements of the administrative court of justice in relation to the title of " garden" have been issued about the identifying a competent authority for its recognition. In this regard, after the enactment of the law on the reform of the law on the conservation and development of greenbelt in ...
Read More
Most of judgements of the administrative court of justice in relation to the title of " garden" have been issued about the identifying a competent authority for its recognition. In this regard, after the enactment of the law on the reform of the law on the conservation and development of greenbelt in cities in 2009 and the formation of the "Article 7 commission", the court's inappropriate procedure in identifying the "article 12 commission of the land-urban law" as a competent authority for recognition the garden was refurbished. In contrast, and because of misinterpretations of the governing laws, one of the issues that have overlooked by the judges was the attention to characteristics of the "garden" and its nature. The present text deals with the court's different and sometimes divergent procedures on the above issues. Also, the nature of article 7 commission and its decisions to identify the competent authority to overseeing them, as well as the decision-making authority for changing the use of gardens, are other issues besides identifying the competent authority to identify the garden, that form the main concern of this article.
Public Law
Mohammad Hasanvand; mina akbari
Abstract
The high-standing status of the written law in Iran's legal system has been manifested as an obvious and unchangeable affair in the ideas of legal thinkers. However, in the field of administrative law, particularly the law of employment, causes such as politically affected legislative system and non-pursuit ...
Read More
The high-standing status of the written law in Iran's legal system has been manifested as an obvious and unchangeable affair in the ideas of legal thinkers. However, in the field of administrative law, particularly the law of employment, causes such as politically affected legislative system and non-pursuit of scientific and specialized ideas as well as repeated alterations of administrative rules have triggered unstable, dispersive, contradictory and cumulative rules to appear in this field, leading to inefficiency of rules. Law has been weak to play its inherent role as a predictable, regulative and decisive source and has followed diversified procedures of administrative authorities and branches of the Administrative Court of Justice. Among the other things, judges of the Administrative Court of Justice as administrative justice for obligating their adjudication and resolution of cases, have this ability to deal with this inefficiency while acting as judge of the branch, and members of specialized bodies and public bodies. The present paper has aimed to prove the mentioned claim, firstly by describing and naming applications of such laws and secondly by analyzing rules and ideas of the Administrative Court of Justice. The inefficiency of the legislative system in this area and the issuance of judicial rulings in the Administrative Court of Justice have implicitly identified the customary role of judicial regulation for the Court of Administrative Justice and somewhat similar to the position of the Supreme Court in the common law system. It has also promoted the status of the judiciary as the main source in Iran's administrative law system, such as the customary law system. However, the law itself is the first source of Administrative Law in Iran's Legal system.
Morteza Nejabatkhah
Abstract
According to Articles 12 (2) and 89 of the Act on Organization and procedure of Administrative Justice Court (1392), the legislator has identified the uniform judicial precedent as a competence of General Board of AJC, in cases where conflicting of judicial decisions issued by one or more branch of this ...
Read More
According to Articles 12 (2) and 89 of the Act on Organization and procedure of Administrative Justice Court (1392), the legislator has identified the uniform judicial precedent as a competence of General Board of AJC, in cases where conflicting of judicial decisions issued by one or more branch of this court. Therefore the question arises: What is meant by inconsistency of judicial decisions and when conflict arises? This paper, by case- study of the precedents of the General Board of AJC, aims to explain the concept and conditions (formal and substantive) of the inconsistency of judicial decisions, as well as the various factors that have led to differing interpretations among the branches of AJC.
Jafar Shafiee; Aliakbar Gorji; Ali Ghanei
Abstract
In this article we are going to study instances of the government's actions which are not subject to the judicial review of Administrative Justice Court. Usually in different legal systems, some government's acts -for some reason- have been excluded from the scope of judicial review. Identifying the ...
Read More
In this article we are going to study instances of the government's actions which are not subject to the judicial review of Administrative Justice Court. Usually in different legal systems, some government's acts -for some reason- have been excluded from the scope of judicial review. Identifying the acts and reasons for unreviewability can contribute to our understanding of the judicial review. In Iran, in addition to legislative limitations, one of the main reasons for limiting the Administrative Justice Court’s jurisdiction is Guardian Council of Constitution’s interpretive approach. In many models of judicial review, the criterion of court’s jurisdiction in reviewing the government’s acts is functional. But, organizational approach Guardian Council of Constitution to Administrative Justice Court’s jurisdiction -that is in conflict with systematic and organic approach to the principles of the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the spirit and underlying philosophy of drafting such a basic law to protect the rights and freedoms of citizens- has led to expansion of the sphere of unreviewbility in the Iranian legal system.
Mohammad Jalali; Mohammad HasanVand; Ayob Miri
Abstract
By the Iranian Constitution, justice courts are considered to be the public authorities to deal with people’s complaints. Alongside these public authorities, the Administrative Justice Court (AJC) has been developed with the aim of “getting people’s right from the government” ...
Read More
By the Iranian Constitution, justice courts are considered to be the public authorities to deal with people’s complaints. Alongside these public authorities, the Administrative Justice Court (AJC) has been developed with the aim of “getting people’s right from the government” and “establishment of administrative justice”. Referring to the principles of the Constitution, one can to some extent make jurisdictional distinctions between the justice courts and the AJC. However, in the Iranian judicial procedure, which has a more precise look at the issue of jurisdiction, and explains the distinctions in a technical manner, the issued decisions indicate that regarding the jurisdiction of the AJC there is not a united procedure, and this disunity applies both to the AJC and public courts. The first question to be raised is whether all claims concerning the government’s civil responsibility should be made before the AJC, or in all cases in which the losers intend to demand compensation from the governmental institutions they first should refer to the AJC in order to ascertain the transgression; or in some cases they can directly make their claims before the public court. Abstracting the cases in which the conditions of the responsibility of the government are met, this study tries to discuss the above questions on the basis of the examination of judicial decisions. Finally, it comes to the conclusion that the general jurisdiction of public justice courts over all civil and criminal claims requires that the jurisdiction of the Administrative Justice Court should be interpreted according to the existing laws and in accordance with the philosophy of the formation of the AJC. Therefore, not all claims could be made before the AJC, and the individual claims for compensation against administration must be interpreted with respect to the nature of the claims, the position of the specific governmental office or department in relation to that of the individual, and the type of the administrative action.
Mohammad Jalali; Hamideh Saeedi Roshan
Abstract
Normative constitution is the highest law system and the consistency of this system requires, following the rules below from the Superior rules. From this view, preservation of the Constitution as the fundamental law governing the legal system of each country needs to legal ways of controlling instruments. ...
Read More
Normative constitution is the highest law system and the consistency of this system requires, following the rules below from the Superior rules. From this view, preservation of the Constitution as the fundamental law governing the legal system of each country needs to legal ways of controlling instruments. This process is followed from two distinct complementary routes of constitutionalization of administrative law and administrization of constitution law by administrative courts and the administrative proceedings in government regulations. Administrative Justice Court (AJC), as the Supreme Court Established under Article 173 of the Constitution, is the court to monitor the actions and decisions of government officials, to adjudication the rights of people, and has the possibility of annulling unlawful decisions and outside of the scope of competence of public administration; in the absence of the Constitutional Court in Iran doing the duty of judicial constitution and judicial protection of the constitution, in practice, has played significant role for monitoring and safeguarding the constitution, especially in the field of public administration that is widest part of the state. In this article, we want to analyze the changing mechanisms of court in the process of constitutionalization of administrative law as a means to monitor the control constitutional of government regulations and most exaltation of processes protection of constitution. According to this, we will consider tools such as revocation of unconstitutional law regulations, supporting to principles of Constitution, interpretation of them and judicial procedure. Also are evaluated tools and Consequences of the process administrization of the constitutional law in procedure of administration Justice Court.
Mohammad Emami; Mahasti Soleimani
Abstract
Since the establishment of the administrative court of justice, there has been a dispute over actionable claims in this new court. The ambiguity of law in this context has led to conflicts in legal doctrine in introducing diagnosis criteria of actionable claims in that court. These two elements ...
Read More
Since the establishment of the administrative court of justice, there has been a dispute over actionable claims in this new court. The ambiguity of law in this context has led to conflicts in legal doctrine in introducing diagnosis criteria of actionable claims in that court. These two elements -ambiguity of law and conflicting legal doctrine– has affected the decisions made by the court's judges. The present study tries to examine and evaluate the diagnosis criteria of actionable claims in the court from the perspective of law, doctrine and judicial proceeding, using a descriptive–analytical method and with a fundamental consideration of the limits and the type of jurisdiction of the administrative court of justice. It attempts, therefore, to yield a right approach to the court's jurisdiction and the related diagnosis criteria of actionable claims.
Easa Daneshpour Bakhshayeshi
Volume 70, Issue 55 , June 2006, , Pages 121-134
Abstract
تقابل آرای وحدت رویه ی دیوان عدالت اداری با آرای دیوان عالی کشور
Read More
تقابل آرای وحدت رویه ی دیوان عدالت اداری با آرای دیوان عالی کشور
